snoop bloggy blog
I feel like as I read articles for class now, I’m looking to be able to spot the “deficit thinking” and when position papers are pushing their point of view on me as a reader. I must just be a ding-dong. I’m sure that the NAYEC/IRA position paper is just chock full of their own agenda, but I just don’t see it! I want to be critical! I want to be able to say, “Oh, see there? That’s where the IRA is really lobbying to the government for such and such.” Oh well, hopefully I’ll get better at this as I continue in grad school.
I must not be very good at spotting deficit thinking, either. In reading “N is for Nonsensical” I see that they are saying what children from lower SES homes have a deficit in, (access to books, highly educated parents, etc.) but it is hard for me sometimes to not know the “deficit” (HATE THAT WORD!) and then create a plan to get the end product. What I mean is that as a teacher, I like to see where a child is coming from, and then that helps me to see what I can do best to get that child to where we would like them to be. This includes knowing the home situation, both what IS in and what IS NOT in the home. I know that it is possible to address these concerns without deficit thinking, but admittedly, sometimes it is hard for me. I have to choose my words carefully. Deficit thinking is such a harsh word. Maybe we can call it…”getting to an even playing field thinking” I don’t know, I’m up for suggestions.
On to what I would use from these articles in my classroom….The “Interactive Storybook Reading” article was a good reminder of what a read aloud is all about. I myself am guilty of using a read aloud as a filler for when I may need to run an errand and my assistant is with them alone or about 5 minutes, and I am also guilty of using a read-aloud for all sorts of wonderful activities and enrichments. I, however, would argue that children can be exposed to both ways of interacting with a book and come out of kindergarten academically unscathed. I think it is important for children to interact with high quality literature in a teacher-led, thoughtful manner with extension activities, focus on vocabulary, and “book talking”. AND I think that is also good for children to sit quietly after lunch and listen to a story read just for the sake of enjoyment. I read tabloids, and I read research. You can do both! One is for enjoyment purely, and the other is to further my education. I see the merit and value in both in my own life, and I see the same merit in my kindergarteners lives with both types of read-alouds.
I would love to read an article that had tons of examples of high-quality children’s literature with examples of activities do with each story. Maybe one day I could create that resource. Like I have stated in my other posts, I love love LOVE to have concrete examples to go with the research and theory behind them. The “Interactive Storybook” article has a short list of kindergarten read-alouds (all of which I think are wonderful) but it would be wonderful to have a super-huge list of these. My favorite activity to do with each story that we read (if the story lends itself) is to act it out. I think this gives the kids a chance to be introduced to drama as well as it helps them to comprehend the story through retelling. With or without props, this is one of my favorite activities within my own classroom. I really believe that books are not just a vehicle for learning, they are the “tour bus” and “tractor trailer” of kindergarten…they let the children see things they may not be exposed to in real life and they expose them to new vocabulary. Just like a tractor trailer they carry loads and loads of information, and just like a tour bus they are one big party!
